How to Read a TRON USDT Risk Report

Start with what was checked

Confirm the exact public address, TRON network, analysis time, and scoring version. Check whether you are looking at a saved historical report, a current checker result, or an illustrative sample. A result for another address or an old settlement cannot answer the present review on its own.

Core screening is free. Deep checks consume one credit, with the available free grants shown on the pricing page. An account gives access to saving and organizing reports, but does not make unavailable provider data complete.

Read freeze and sanctions as independent facts

The freeze assessment combines available blacklist evidence and surfaces disagreement. No direct match describes the observed state; inconclusive means the available evidence did not establish a reliable answer. The OFAC field separately reports an exact address match against its cached dataset.

Do not replace these fields with the overall score. A source outage can reduce the completeness of a report even if other sources return results. A sanctions match does not by itself describe the exact current contract restriction, and a negative address match is not a complete sanctions assessment.

Check freshness, confidence, and coverage together

Source freshness and report time are different. A check can run now while using cached TronScan results, periodically refreshed OFAC identifiers, or indexed Tether event history. The direct contract read is a separate live request. Consult the source panel and data-sources page for those distinctions.

Completed checks, sampled evidence, locked checks, and failed checks convey different limits. Sampled transfer history covers only the inspected window or counterparties. Locked evidence was not run under the available access. Failed evidence is unavailable, not negative. Risk evidence confidence reflects the support for the assessment; it is not a guarantee of completeness.

Explain the score from its signals

Use the named signals and linked evidence to understand why points were added. Raw volume does not score on its own. Concentration and movement patterns are subject to the model's eligibility rules, and exposure describes observed connections rather than proven common ownership or criminal intent.

Compare reports using their scoring versions and coverage. A changed score may reflect new evidence, a different window, or a model revision. Do not describe a score change as new misconduct without checking its cause.

1. Open evidence for the signals that contributed points.
2. Note any sampling, stale sources, or failed checks affecting those signals.
3. Document what remains unknown and whether your policy requires another review.
4. Save the report with its version and timestamps before sharing an exported copy.